|
by F.
Owen Irvine
No. 3, January 2005 - June 2005
Motivation for the Research
A number of explanations have been offered for the observed
decline in GDP volatility since the mid 1980s. Valerie
Ramey and Daniel Vine offered the hypothesis that a decline
in the persistence of sales led to the decline in GDP volatility.
Their theoretical production smoothing models show that
a decrease in sales persistence leads to a decline in the
variance of production relative to the variance of sales.
They estimated equations explaining unit sales of motor
vehicles that show that sales persistence declined in this
industry after 1983.
This paper tests the Ramey-Vine hypothesis, first on sales
date from the aggregate retail, wholesale, and manufacturing
sectors, and then on sales data from many other industries.
Finally, it explores reasons why sales persistence may have
declined in some of these industries.
Research Approach
Using monthly, seasonally adjusted sales data for available
2- and 3-digit SIC manufacturing and trade industries from
January 1967 through March 2001, the author estimates equations
using the same empirical model employed by Ramey and Vine.
Key Findings
- The estimates confirm the Ramey-Vine findings
for motor vehicle retailers, wholesalers, and manufacturers.
- In
equations estimated for aggregate manufacturing, wholesaling,
and retail sector sales, declines in sales persistence
were not found, despite the fact that these manufacturing
and trade sales aggregates each contain motor vehicle sectors.
- While
sales variance decreased for most durable goods industries,
outside of motor-vehiclerelated industries this reduction
in variance came mainly through channels other than a reduction
in sales persistence.
- For the nondurable goods industries,
sales persistence is estimated to have increased significantly
at the retail level but decreased at the wholesaler and,
especially, the manufacturing level.
- For a number
of industries outside motor vehicles, especially those
in wholesaling and nondurable manufacturing, considerable
evidence was found of declines in sales persistence. These
declines seem to be consistent with changes in supply and
distribution chains that have occurred as the result of
the introduction of new information technology and the
adoption of new inventory and production control systems.
Implications
There appears to be no indication of a decline in the persistence
of the sales of the main goods sectors of the economy—manufacturing,
wholesaling, and retailing. In this sense, the Ramey-Vine
hypothesis—that declines in sales persistence are
a major separate explanation of the decline in GDP volatility—is
not supported.
However, the finding that sales persistence
has declined in a number of industries seems to be consistent
with the structural changes that have occurred as a result
of the introduction of new information technology and the
new relationships between upstream and downstream firms
in supply and distribution chains. To prove that structural
change is a major reason for the decline in GDP volatility
will require further detailed modeling of the interactions
among industries. Declines in sales persistence will probably
be part of that story.
Full text of Working
Paper 05-5 
|