|
Working
Paper 04-6
by Ricardo Caballero, Kevin N. Cowan, Eduardo M.R.A.
Engel, and Alejandro Micco
Microeconomic flexibility, by facilitating the process
of creative destruction, is at the core of economic
growth in modern market economies. The main reason
why this process is not infinitely fast is the presence
of adjustment costs, some of them technological, others
institutional. Chief among the latter is labor market
regulation. While few economists would object to such
a view, its empirical support is rather weak. In this
paper we revisit this hypothesis and find strong evidence
for it. We use a new sectoral panel for 60 countries
and a methodology suitable for such a panel. We find
that job security regulation clearly hampers the creative-destructive
process, especially in countries where regulations
are likely to be enforced. Moving from the 20th to
the 80th percentile in job security, in countries with
strong rule of law, cuts the annual speed of adjustment
to shocks by a third while shaving off about one percent
from annual productivity growth. The same movement
has negligible effects in countries with weak rule
of law.
JEL classification codes: E24, J23, J63, J64, K00
PDF version of paper 
|