Race, Obesity, and
the Puzzle of Gender Specificity
Working Paper 08-8
by Mary A. Burke and Frank Heiland
Obesity is significantly more prevalent among non-Hispanic
African-American (henceforth “black”) women
than among non-Hispanic white American (henceforth “white”)
women. These differences have persisted without much
alteration since the early 1970s, despite substantial
increases in the rates of obesity among both groups.
Over the same time period, however, we observe little
to no significant differences in the prevalence of obesity
between black men and white men. Using data from the
National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES)
and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
pertaining to the past two decades, we evaluate an extensive
list of potential explanations for these patterns, including
race and gender differences in economic incentives,
in body size ideals, and in biological factors. We find
that the gaps in mean BMI and in obesity prevalence
between black
women and white women do not narrow substantially after
controlling for educational attainment, household income, occupation, location,
and marital status—nor do such controls eliminate
the gender-specificity of racial differences in obesity.
Following these results, we narrow down the list of
explanations to two in particular, both of which are
based on the idea that black women (but not also black
men) face weaker incentives than white women to avoid
becoming obese; one explanation involves health-related
incentives, the other, sociocultural incentives. While
the data show qualified support for both explanations,
we find that the sociocultural incentives hypothesis
has the potential to reconcile a greater number of stylized
facts.
JEL Classifications: D11, I12, J15, Z13
PDF version of paper  |